Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 91 to 94 of 94

Thread: SHAREFARMERS......no respect for royalty

  1. #91

    Re: SHAREFARMERS......no respect for royalty

    Let me know how you get on Rosco, prob going to put some out tomorrow arvo, may even use floats...
    Haha

  2. #92

    Re: SHAREFARMERS......no respect for royalty

    Ok, so I now see what all the fuss is about. I chucked my one and only pot in the Pine River early this morning and headed off for a fish. Got a few flatties and a couple of decent bream from the bridges and called it a day. Got back to my pot with the float stashed neatly away from greedy eyes and pulled her up.....I bloody got one! A male and a legal keeper, couldn't believe it. Was absolutely stoked!

  3. #93

    Re: SHAREFARMERS......no respect for royalty

    to those suggesting a rec license for more fisheries patrols etc. That is ludicrous. Think about. Based on this, the govt could then say we need 1000 more police, each house will be levied $1000 to provide this. The job of a Govt is to ensure they provide enforcement of the laws. if the Members of Parliament are not capable of providing this security to the population, then they should immediately resign. The current batch of incompetents should all resign immediately. They cannot even stop the violence in the valley let alone anything fisheries.

  4. #94

    Re: SHAREFARMERS......no respect for royalty

    So what will you suggest be done Mod2 to get some decent policing? or are you prepared to do nothing and let the fishery decline at a much faster rate when everyone bends or ignores the rules and laws?
    AS much as you dislike the idea of a licencing funded patrol, until you come up with an alternative that could provide the extra forces and hours the fishery will decline and the morals of those left will decline as well.
    Jack.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us