Greetings Pinhead
The point I was trying to make is I believe the biggest threat will come from an overpopulating world, rather than Climate change, by 2030.
To be more specific .. Australia is heading down the path of spending a substantial part of its GDP on renewable energy.
Most Australians think we are a wealthy country ... in the global scheme, per head we are .. at the COUNTRY level we are not.
As far as GDP goes .. once the mining boom ceases, we will be a relatively insignificant country again.
I apologize Ben if this is a bit broader than purely sea water Ph, however it is after all a VERY large issue with everything inextricably linked.
I believe that money is a finite source .. if spent on Australia reducing it's CO2 for not a really valid reason . other than making ourselves feel as though we are 'helping' .. consequently we will have less money spent on what I think by 2030 will be REALLY important:
1. Australia mitigating the effects of climate change ie. building Dams, infrastructure to reduce effects of sea-level rises, spending REAL dollars on research to see consequnces of CC, then ADAPTING to it.
2. Making sure that we don't spend our GDP trying to stick OUR finger in the dyke when the rest of the world is still causing the tsunamai.
The science of climate change is not very complex .. but very hard to PROVE so that everyone believes it as the changes at the moment are quite subtle and IMHO still within the realms of climate/weather variablity. For mere mortals, such as I, to try and discuss the science is futile ... as someone somewhere has a proving or disproving statement
I have been fortunate, since I retired 8 years ago to travel O/S quite a bit, much of it for fishing. In NO OTHER COUNTRY is climate change as front page news as it is in Australia. In fact in a 3 week trip to USA in August/September I did not see one reference to climate change/CO2 emissions etc. Similarly in France/Canada and Norway in 2010.
So in some respects this IS driven by the media in Australia.