+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 45 of 53
-
08-10-2012 07:20 PM #31
08-10-2012 10:22 PM
#32
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
I understand that.
But you've hit the nail on the head...
"...the license does not mean you will immediately stop be a pest on the radio, but it does prove you SHOULD know better!"
Doesnt help anyone, nor actually fix any long standing gripes.
I see no course nor seperate license to operate an inflatable PFD1 which is also mandatory, nor how an Epirb works, how not to do 25 knts in a thick fog etc etc. Iif you have a boat license you're expected to be smart enough to operate these basic things after reading a simple manual. A VHF radio isnt exactly complex, nor do you need to know much to operate it PROPERLY.
I see no reason why they cant simply make it a requirement to attach a simple to read instruction/requirement card/page to any new VHF sold...and send one out to existing users....and to be licensed you need to sign the bottom, rip off and post back in as having read it. Achieves the same thing.
The whole idea of training courses, licenses etc is just overkill and nanny state bother that doesnt solve anything...certainly doesnt and hasnt stopped captain peanut (who has a VHF license) from discussing the legal size of a sargeant baker in Croatian whilst some poor bastard is sinking.
08-10-2012 10:44 PM
#33
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
just wanting to know something guys what is the fine for not haven a License?
just working out what the fine is to the cost of the coruse.
Not much use gitting a fine then have to pay to do the coruse.
I understand both side of what people are saying here, and both side have there good points and bad points.
09-10-2012 12:33 AM
#34
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
How bloody hard is it? Create a free online course that prints a certificate at the end of it. For the very small portion of the population that can't use a computer then simply pay a nice donation to a VMR to do one. I don't have a licence and doubt I will be getting one anytime soon.
Democracy: Simply a system that allows the 51% to steal from the other 49%.
09-10-2012 05:04 AM
#35
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
I haven't turned my radio (27MHz) on for 10 years, if I go VHF there's no way I'll be getting legal.
09-10-2012 05:24 AM
#36
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
My understanding of it is currently it takes just as long, if not longer, to do the radio operators course than it does for the course to actually get your boat licence.
Tell me thats time well spent?
Takes about a minute to read this, laminate a copy of it and bung it on the boat and why would you need anymore "training"
http://www.msq.qld.gov.au/Safety/Marine-radios.aspx
10-10-2012 09:01 PM
#37
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
1. Obviously the opposing attitudes will require some re-adjustment in going forwarding to achieve a more acceptable outcome.
2. Modern radio equipment will/does have the capability to weed out the abusers and those that think they are somehow exempt from acquiring or requiring acceptable radio etiquette covering internationally used radio systems.
10-10-2012 09:38 PM
#38
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
Democracy: Simply a system that allows the 51% to steal from the other 49%.
10-10-2012 10:41 PM
#39
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
11-10-2012 06:33 AM
#40
11-10-2012 06:41 AM
#41
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
Garry
http://www.gdmarineservices.com.au Call for a great price on a New Honda outboard, Engines In Stock Now !!!
11-10-2012 04:11 PM
#42
11-10-2012 05:54 PM
#43
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
Re point 2... THe days of government officials with direction finding radio equipment policing stuff is long gone IMHO. And if you dont have a registered MSMI, and you aren't transmitting continuously, then just how do you reckon they are going to find you? Assuming that there is anyone left in the government that is paid enough to give a toss?
11-10-2012 09:54 PM
#44
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
Try looking here.. this a commonwealth government agency.
http://www.amsa.gov.au/
"
VHF Marine Radio Operator Qualifications - Have Your Say
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is considering new directions for VHF marine radio operators, their qualifications and other arrangments for recreational vessels.
A review has been triggered by concerns expressed to the ACMA by the National Marine Safety Committee (NMSC). The concerns relate to the perceived declining standards in the operation of marine VHF equipment and apparent low compliance in the recreational boating community with the requirement for marine radio operator qualifications.
ACMA has released a public discussion paper and undertaken a range of activities including: commissioning an independent survey to measure awareness and compliance with the marine radio operator’s certificate of proficiency, examination of available marine safety data and regulation of carriage of VHF marine radios. The Media Authority is also seeking the opinions of those who use VHF marine radio and other interested parties through a online survey or direct contact.
For more information regarding the review and to have your say, please follow the link to the ACMA survey or visit www.acma.gov.au."
these people can change the law.. (not necessarily for the better or for the good of the people).
Regards
Honda
13-10-2012 10:57 PM
#45
Re: Mandatory Qualifications for Recreational VHF
A step in the right direction,the realisation that an ever increasing amount of ppl have a vhf with no licence either through choice or ignorance.
It's only radio procedure, it's not like your'e preforming open heart surgery.
A online course akin to OH & S safety inductions and some course accreditations is all that it required.
To those that want to do a course go for it but the realisation is dawning that you can't fine everyone that isn't licenced.







Reply With Quote





