Jim..I will be honest. I really do not give a rats about the environment.YOU AND MOST ARDENT CAPITALISTS..until after the people are accomodated THIS IS THE BIT WHERE YOUR LACK OF ECOLOGY 101 LEASONS LETS YOU DOWN - THE ENVIRONMENT IS REQUIRED TO ACCOMODATE HUMANS - WE ARE ANIMALS AND WE REQUIRE HABITAT - ADHERING TO GROWTH IN BOTH THE HUMAN POPULATION AND THE MATERIAL ECONOMY WILL ULTIMATELY UNDERMINE THE GLOBAL ECOSYSTEM'S ABILITY TO 'ACCOMODATE' HUMANS AND A LOT OF OTHER SPECIES AND ECOSYSTEMS BEFORE WE GET TO THE HUMAN CRUNCH POINT. I am an avowed capitalist.NO REALLY?.if you don't like the capitalist system might I suggest some other places you may prefer NO YOU MIGHT NOT SUGGEST THAT - I HAVE AS MUCH RIGHT TO STAY HERE IF NOT MORE GIVEN MY COMMITTMENT TO THE SUSTAINABILITY OF OUR SOCIETY AND OUR CHILDRENS FUTURE - UNLIKE YOU - WHICH ONE OF THOSE PLACES DO YOU PREFER?? PERHAPS CHINA GIVEN THEIR NEW FOUND LOVE AFFAIR WITH THE MARKET ECONOMY OR AND THEIR LARGE POPULATION AND MANUFACTURING BASE - SOUNDS LIKE YOUR SORT OF PLACE..Iran, Iraq, Afhganistan NOT GOING TO THOSE PLACES WHILE YOUR CAPITALIST MATES ARE TRYING TO SURE UP THEIR DIMINISHING OIL SUPPLIES, China..CHINA ARE MORE SUCCESSFUL CAPITALISTS THAN US CURRENTLY (GROWTH ~8%?) ALBEIT STATE CONTROILLED CAPITALIST try one of those if you don't like our system WHO SAID IT IS 'OUR' SYSTEM - I THINK IF AUSTRALIAN'S HAD AN OPEN DISCUSSION AND DEBATE ABOUT THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM WE HAVE AND GIVEN VIABLE ALTERNATIVES THE CURRENT 'SYSTEM' MIGHT NOT BE THE ONE WE CHOOSE TO BE 'OURS'.
As for the need for an increased population..amazing how everyone has made comments about manufacturing..there isn;t any here...why?? the market is too small. Just think of the extra jobs an increased population will require...we could then use a lot of the materials we currently export as well as increase our export matkets AND THEN WE CAN DIVIDE THE INCREASED ECONOMY BY THE INCREASED POPULATION AND BE WHERE WE ARE NOW (OR WORSE) ON A PER CAPITA BASIS - SO WHAT HAVE WE GAINED??.
As for the comments about climate change..is this actually a man made thing or just the Earth going through its cyclical changes THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMUNITY HAS MOVED ON FROM DEBATING WHETHER CLIMATE CHANGE IS WITH US OR NOT AND IF YOU DONT ACCEPT IT YOUR LIVING IN DENIAL. I heard one scientist state that global warming is not such a bad thing..that if the earth cools then another ice age could be upon us in as little as 70 years..and we all know the consequences of that. YES BUT WE DON'T KNOW THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PREDICTED 6 DEGREES OF MEAN GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RISE BY THE END OF THE CENTUARY OTHER THAN IT BEING BAD AND POSSIBLY IRRIVERSIBLE IN TERMS OF IMPACT TO MANY OF THE EARTH'S LIFE SUPPORT ECOSYSTEMS
As for space for 40 million people..are you serious...with the area we have..heaps of room ROOM IS NOT THE RESOURCE WE ARE SHORT OF - DUH - REMEMBER THE THREAD IS ABOUT THE WATER CRISIS - IF SE QLD HAS TWICE THE POPULATION EVEN WITH TWICE THE DAMS WE'LL BE BACK WHERE WE ARE NOW IN TERMS OF WATER SUPPY PER CAPITA - SO WHERE IS THE GAIN??.
Back to the original topic..water..I am a firmer believer in the need for more dams WHY NOT LESS PEOPLE - YOUR ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN LESS THAN CONVINCING and will gladly support whichever political party gets their fingers out and does something about it GOOD OLD REACTIVE POLICY - KEEPS US LURCHING FROM ONE CRISIS TO ANOTHER
. #End of my discussion on this.