Had them on and off, no difference in fuel use, the vents in the cover line up with the cowl vents, can't see how it can make a difference at all, unless it's just a travel cover?
A friend says he was surprised when he left his cowl cover on for a trip that he used significantly more fuel than normal and he takes his cowl cover off (the vented type) Has anyone else trialled running with and without the cover. I have intended to try and test it myself but it's difficult to do a long test run in very similar conditions.
Had them on and off, no difference in fuel use, the vents in the cover line up with the cowl vents, can't see how it can make a difference at all, unless it's just a travel cover?
I haven't noticed fuel siddweenxe but some cowls don't do well....paint bubbling with condensation trapped. Cheers
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Boat: Seafarer Vagabond
Live: Great South East....love Moreton Bay fishing
Ozcott, mine has a felt type lining. I imagine foam could react with petrol fumes. Some things should never be together, I know rubber and ally aren't happy buddies unless you have a full layer of sealant between them.
The cowl is designed to draw air in at the back and it travels around the sides, keeping things cool and in through an intake at the front.
I've logged manifold pressure at full throttle on a T60 and there is very, very little pressure drop from having the cowl on. Any advantage at cruise would be placebo effect.
140a zuk outboard cover 4 years no paint problems or air restrictions.
The outboards cowling intake is at the rear to stop the outboard sucking water strait into the engine
Only thing i would think of is aerodinamics rather than have a big gush of twiling air like a tornado coming in thru the intake the screen is breaking up thst tornado air flow kind of like myth busters using straws in there air flow tank testing thingy
Sent from my SM-G900I using Ausfish mobile app
OCA covers have had significant R&D to ensure they don't restrict air flow
Garry
Retired Honda Master Tech