Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Stringray or SE 300

  1. #1

    Stringray or SE 300

    I have had both types of hydrofoils in the past on different boats but never tried both on the same boat. Can anyone offer advice or information on which is considered the better of the two and why.
    Thanks in advance.

    Mark

  2. #2

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    I will be first to ask, why are you getting a foil?

  3. #3

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Quote Originally Posted by Noelm View Post
    I will be first to ask, why are you getting a foil?
    I have a Signature 542F with a Yamaha 130 hp I find it gets on the plane easy and quick if I want it to but if I just want to motor along a little slower and particularly if passengers are on the rear seat it tends to bog down unless I throttle it harder and get on the plane then slow up. A previous boat 630 signature with a 150 hp Honda was similar and a SE300 improved it dramatically.

  4. #4

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Maybe trim tabs would suit better? I know more expensive, but would allow you better flexibility when driving. I've got them on my 543SF and love them. Mat.

  5. #5

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    I put a permatrim on a merc leg to try and help with the bogging down...it did help but I found the boat would lean to one side or other more as well.....I put it down to the deep v hull "thing"...and the fact that the extra lift was coming from the bottom centre of the vee....

    In the end I took it off and after some advice from someone else ..put on those relatively cheap spring loaded trim tabs...I found they work extremely well in that the boat gets up and stays up on the plane to a lower speed ...just a lot more spray..and with the extra lift coming from the outside of the vee it seems to help overall stability.They have lasted four or five years so far.Granted the controllable ones would be more flexible ,but these will help if you dont want to spend the extra dough.

  6. #6

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Get a Lazilas LZ foil. Upward sloping so no vices, if anything they want to bring you back up to vertical again. Boating and RV used to have them. Ebay seem to have them for $45 + $15pp so one of the cheapest foils anyway, and the best IMHO.

  7. #7

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    I'm a permatrim fan.
    Kids who Hunt and Fish, Don't Deal and Steal.

  8. #8

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Is your motor at the right height? Having the motor too low can have all sorts of wierd problems like bogging down and heavy steering. The first signature I tested had heavy steering. The salesman suggested i trim it all the way in. Didnt sound right and didn't feel right.

  9. #9

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy56 View Post
    Is your motor at the right height? Having the motor too low can have all sorts of wierd problems like bogging down and heavy steering. The first signature I tested had heavy steering. The salesman suggested i trim it all the way in. Didnt sound right and didn't feel right.
    Yeah motor height is all good runs fine and trims perfectly with 2 up steering is fine its more about taking off slower as if trolling sits bum down. I had a larger signature previously and it was the same fitted a SE300 and it improved it well. I guess my question really is does anyone or has anyone tried both the older style stingray V the Se300 and found one to be better than the other.

  10. #10

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    It may be difficult to find people who have tried both. I have a very similar boat to yours fitted with the SE300 (Haines Signature 550C). I have had it on the boat for over 10 years and would not change a thing. Most of my work is done trolling offshore and it is great. The boat planes quickly and I swear by this combo.

    Brett

  11. #11

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Take smithys advice. I've never understood if the motor height is right how the down turned hydrofoils don't increase drag an cause steering issues as they are still in the water when on the plane. Or get a permatrim
    Kids who Hunt and Fish, Don't Deal and Steal.

  12. #12

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Found the early Stingrays threw up a lot of spray because of the thicker front end of the foil whereas the SE300 didn't. They both worked well except that the Stingray threw up a lot of spray.
    Duck

    Sent from my PNDP51M10BLK using Ausfish mobile app

  13. #13
    Ausfish Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Clifton Beach, QLD

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Mate, I have snapped 2 Stingray hydrofoils on the quinny (75 Etec) from fair wear all within 20 hours and replaced on warranty both black and white.... I had a 300SE on my merc for 400hours without issue.

  14. #14
    Ausfish Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Clifton Beach, QLD

    Re: Stringray or SE 300

    Mate, I have snapped 2 Stingray hydrofoils on the quinny (75 Etec) from fair wear all within 20 hours and replaced on warranty both black and white.... I had a 300SE on my merc for 400hours without issue. Did the job, gave good plaining, reduced cavitation, improved fuel economy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us