BRP are realy left with no option but to persue the DI two stroke line, beacuse utherwise they would have to start again.
A process they neither have the funds nor engineering capacity to do, or buy engines or designs from a larger better equiped competitor which would substantially reduce their profitability.
now with two stroke regardless of how the oil gets into the crank case, the fundamental limiting factor is that it, has to get to the bores, and that means the oil has to be in the air at some point, and thus it will be burned.
There is simply no way arround two strokes consuming oil and burning it.....unless someone comes up with some sort of high temperature, self lubricating way of sealing a piston other than metal piston rings running in a metal bore lubricted by oil.
And here lies the problem, as you strave the amount of oil, to reduce the emissions the lubrication of the bore suffers....mostly two strokes have either roller or ball bearing bottom ends both of which need very little oil to work incomparison to slipper bearings so the bearings are not the problem....if there was a better way to seal the piston, the beraings could be sealed or lubricated independently.
My understanding is that the most common major engine failures in DI two strokes of all types and uses are bore related.
because there is no oil flow or pool of oil and no means of filtering or removing products of wear from the engine, the bores don't get washed clean of any abraded material and as such as soon as there is any pick up of metal from the bores by the rings, the whole thing goes bad very quickly......this is just a fact of two stroke period, but as soon as you starve lubricant the whole issue escilates.
I can certainly see why we are seeing 4 stroke moving into lots of traditionally 2 stroke applications.
as for me I will be sticking with my old tech two stroke running a more modern oil...maybe I will buy a 4 stroke one day, buy I doubt very much that I will every buy a DI two stroke of any brand.
cheers