Originally Posted by
Dick Pasfield
Over use of negative qualifiers and emoticons I'd say Shane. They throw a shade of malignancy over the questions and statements which if worded better would have been good discussion points. Unfortunately that probably won’t happen.
As an example read the post again and picture the 'roll eyes' in an actual conversation in a number of senarios. From a mate they'd most likely be fine, from someone you're not sure of they could unsettle you or you might end up feeling a bit hostile about them. The wink at the end does not help either. Pity, could have gone somewhere but was doomed from inception.
Originally Posted by
Apollo
I guess the problem with any TV footage is that you don't get the whole picture as the guy actually doing it, sees it. What I mean is that as the camera is focusing on the 'pro' and their rod/body work, it isn't focusing on what the fish is trying to do and thus what the 'pro' is trying to counter that or the other way around. We are not getting the whole perspective.
An example. Couple of days ago I was fishing bank side for barra on very light line and hooked onto a mid size fish. The owner of the property saw me hooked up and drove down to see how I had done. He turns up and comments that I running along the bank a bit and would be better off standing still to apply more consistent pressure on the fish. This was his (the observer) perspective! What he didn't see was that I was on 4lb line and the fish was in amoungst weeds and lillies so I needed to continually change my angle of attack to give me a chance to get the fish out of the 'salad bowl' without the aid of heavy drag/line and rod power. This was my perspective (right or wrong, however I will claim right as it was landed).
My initial observations to the Mondy round, were that the Taylors used a couple of very quick, short, sharp hook sets and sometimes this was repeated. Why? What were they trying to counter? I would be interested to know as this technique could be useful. This is different to how I have done it in the past, so is something to remember to try if poor hook set becomes an issue for me. I agree that the fight (for all the competitors) seemed to be hard and fast but without actually being there and getting the full picture, I am unable to make comment. I did see that several fish were almost netted as they jumped close to the boat. Maybe this is a landing technique that could be used for barra. I have done it for toga. Certainly a skill to develop for the net man (plus strong arms).
The footage of one Taylor over the side with rod fully submerged to counter the barra that went under the boat and then have it jumping on the other side of the boat, kind of deflates the low rod angle bit to stop jumping theory a bit. This was excellent footage.
I found this series much better than last and am happy that they put the two Taylors together as they really are a 1+1=3 type combination.
Thanks to all for putting up your comments/observations as it give the rest of us some other viewpoints to consider/look for and as has been said, hopefully learnt from.
Cheers
Steve
Originally Posted by
alphas
So true,what would this section become if the crew left for a month or two??
Yes,the smartest people on AF are Cy and Kerrin.
Some people I fish with would love to share some of their techniques and thoughts,but once I pointed them here they replied with"too niche,and seems too biased to one particular group"
A shame,as some of the techniques they are using are mind boggling..Even to the extent that we now can target and catch barramundi in the brisbane river with some of these left field tech..(scour the net,you'll see the pics)
I dont care for the "coached"comments,if top ranking anglers seek out the advice of their peers-all the more luck to them.
Why dont some of you pay and go for a charter with JM?? See if some of his musings do work,learn..even if it is the smallest thing,it would be valuable.
A pack mentality exists here.What gives with printing and handing out ettiquette paperwork which was proposed earlier???In a public place,like an impoundment as long as the LAW is observed you are free to fish how and what you like.
Old mate with the noisy 2 stroke blowing your spot,big deal-move on.
Lets see what becomes of it,could certain people let others run the roost here??
Originally Posted by
alphas
I dont bother here much anymore..
A new year and the same old crap.So called "Mondy crew" vs. the guides and fellow associated scribes.
What really gets achieved-narry much..
If you really want some rain on a parade,here goes...
"Mondy crew"pls all get an account on MSN,then u can chat beers,twisted leaders,braid colour and "to the shed..." as you want without taxing a forum where it feels now days if you are not part of the "crew",your opinion matters not.
To JM and co.-is it really worth your time banging your head against the wall so much here??
Let me say it,if you want no bullshit barra info/chat,head to sweetwater.com.au,
carefully constructed replies from some real anglers at the forefront...
Just my observations,I truly mean not to offend.But this freshwater section is really not what it used to be anymore.
The slanging matches are most tiresome...I have strapped on the helmet,I'm sure the missiles will be thick and fast.
Alpha: Some very constructive and positive work on your part. Conducive to good relationships and the proactive exchange of information. I understand your frustration, some seem to post here only to have ago at others rather than make a positive contribution, or offer some useful information, annoying isint't?
No wonder some people steer clear.
Dick: You hit the nail on the head, suggesting the method of delivery may be confrontational; particularly to those who don't know the authors. The reality is the regular contenders on here do have a wealth of information and experience to share. If only they were a little more diplomatic perhaps. They are like dogs chasing a rabbit perhaps, they both want the same outcome but are sufficiently distracted with each to bark at each other along the way.
Appolo: A perfect example of in my book i.e.
Not something I would usually do.
I am interested to know why do it that way?
What are the advantages.
I am keen to know
I might learn something.
Thanks for the information
To those contenders / sparring partners; Perhaps consider asking why, what are the advantages, I am interested know, I noticed they did ........ can some one explain why?
I have a question on the jump set but will start a thread.
I personally was interested in the AFC to watch, learn and be entertained.
Thanks Whitto for the reminders.
Thanks to those who have posted informative information.
JM I wish there was a way to search all your posts and put them together.
It would make a great book. Food for thought? 'JM's posts'