Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Doesn't seem to add up ??

  1. #1

    Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Just looking at the spec's on the QM 2 and she weighs 150,000 tons
    Okay big, and her 6 motors produce 157, 000 HP.

    Now thats 1 HP per ton, according to logic ain't now way she would move.
    what am I missing here.

  2. #2

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    there is a lot more to this than weight to HP, it all comes into things like waterline length and lots of stuff! very very complicated and there is lots of scientific stuff available about propulsion from Naval designers and so on.

  3. #3

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Quote Originally Posted by Roughasguts View Post
    Just looking at the spec's on the QM 2 and she weighs 150,000 tons
    Okay big, and her 6 motors produce 157, 000 HP.

    Now thats 1 HP per ton, according to logic ain't now way she would move.
    what am I missing here.
    Archimedes Principle which i'm learning at school may have something to do with it. The water is supporting the weight so that the engines don't have to work as hard as they would if they were pushing opr pulling something on dry land. i may be wrong though

    jj

  4. #4

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Gut's need WOT RPM and GPS speed with full tanks and compliment or it is just a waste of time and space, you should know that!

    Wonder what the prop surface area per 1K HP is? She is a displacement vessel so the rules change greatly, imagine how many HP needed to plane the thing!!

    cheers fnq
    Last edited by FNQCairns; 21-02-2007 at 08:38 AM.



  5. #5

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Unfortunately most fishos and boatowners are fixated on horsepower. The modern marine diesel engine, especially the long-stroke type, produce huge amounts of torque and in matters maritime this is what counts, not horsepower.

  6. #6

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Thank's guys, yeah there is something here I can't get me head around.
    I notice these big things idle past at 8-10 knots and not a ripple behind the boat. When you consider there moving thousands of tons of water, seems a lot has to do with shape of the hull, got me buggered.
    Can't imagine how the hold course in a cross wind at low speeds either.

    I know if you fly through the wake of a 747 on take off your dead, doesn't seem to be the same with the wake with a huge ship.

  7. #7

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Ahh but Triman two of the QM 2 motors are gas turbines, ain't no long stroke motors there, just big Rev boxes.

  8. #8

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    I am not even going to pretend I understand displacement vessel rules, the ultimate displacement vessel is a sub when underwater, suspect this big ship would throw a HUGE wake at cruise when viewed from a small boats persective.

    It's interesting when pushing up a tight creek at dead slow speed how much the water level rises on the bank even from a 16 footer.

    cheers fnq



  9. #9

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Roughasguts, ship hull design has slowly improved over the years to such an extent that at low speeds they are extremely efficient, and one of the major reasons for the low wake at slow speeds has been the use of the bulbous bow. I don't claim to know the theory, practice or mathematics behind it but designing a bulbous bow into a dispalcement hull somehow minimises the bow wave. Energy going into producing a bow wave is energy lost in the propulsion of a ship so the vessel can either go faster on installed horsepower/torque or use a smaller propulsion plant for given speed if bow waves are eliminated or at least lessened.
    Regarding the LM2500 gas turbines they are serious fuel-guzzlers and would only be used when absolutely needed, but their power output versus unit size is huge, giving great output from a small package.

  10. #10

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    how do these extra engines couple to the prop shaft(s)?? surely a gearbox isn't used or is it a hydraulic coupling?

  11. #11

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Not sure here guy's the tech info isn't great, but i'm thinking the gas turbine engines which are housed just under the stack are hooked up to electric motors.

    Thank's Triman thought that boulbous bow was for added bouyancy, learn something every day.

    Now you got to be a ships captain right.

  12. #12

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Think this ship is stopping over at Cairns soon, anyone know it's draft? Suspect that once it reaches the reef, it will be truly unsinkable, would make for a great platform to cast toward green zones

    They must be going to anchor it outside the reef and transport people, I dunno.

    The other world's largest ship or whatever anchored 5km off yorkys and transported passengers in their enclosed 25ft tenders, rough day, many sick bags and green people -was funny!

    cheers fnq



  13. #13

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    You might do a search for CODAG as QM2 proplusion is dual.

    As for the HP? Sounds about right relative to the displacement.

  14. #14

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    FNQ, Draft is only 10 metres, just a shallow draft punt compared to some of the coal boats

  15. #15

    Re: Doesn't seem to add up ??

    Yeah CODAG big two strokes, backed up with Gas turbines.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us