PDA

View Full Version : Cairns City Council Press Release



Vern_Veitch
24-08-2002, 08:59 AM
DATE: 23 August 2002 TO: All Media

BARRIER REEF CLOSURES NOT AN OPTION FOR RECREATIONAL FISHERS

The continuing subliminal campaign by the GBRMPA to gain public acceptance of the closure of 25% of the Reef to recreational fishers, will be met by a massive campaign and even open revolt, according to the Mayor of Cairns, Cr Kevin Byrne.

Cr Byrne said he was astounded by the measures being put forward as justification for the proposed closures.

“The Chair of GBRMPA, Ms Virginia Chadwick has stated publicly that she is intent on the 25% option, because it was declared policy of all parties at the last federal election. Well, that’s a significant point of debate, as I never heard any such policy being espoused by either side of politics – and I keep a pretty close ear to the ground on these matters.”

“They then promote someone like Mr Billy Causey from Florida to come out and espouse their cause at the so called ‘World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas’. Of course Mr Causey would promote the concept, as he manages one such area. But what he fails to tell us, and what GBRMPA doesn’t want us to know, is that Florida Keys has just 7% locked up. We already have 5%, so why the manic intent on locking up a further 20%?” Cr Byrne asked.

Cr Byrne said the concept being promoted by GBRMPA, that more and bigger fish would be caught in the remaining areas was an absolute fallacy.

“The fact is the opposite will occur. As more fishers congregate on less open reef, the pressures will intensify. That will lead to reduced capacity, which will in turn lead to more calls for further closures, until the entire Marine Park area will become an ideological battleground.” Cr Byrne said.

“In fact, if the World Wildlife Fund has its way, that will happen in the immediate future, as their spokesperson, Imogen Zethoven said on SBS on 8 August, ‘We should start from a starting point of saying why not 100% protected?”

“It appears the case being put forward by GBRMPA is that “closure takes the guesswork out of it (management)”, as suggested by Mr Causey.”

“If that’s the case, and if that’s where the sympathies of GBRMPA lie, then there will be open revolt amongst the many hundreds of thousands of recreational fishers across North Queensland.” Cr Byrne said.

CR Byrne said the significant degradation being caused to the Marine Park by commercial live fishing and trawl operators was the primary direction in which the authorities should be headed.

“For every coral trout taken by a recreational fisher across the Marine Park, the live fish industry takes five, which amounted last year to some 1580 tonnes. In addition, they take an untold amount of by catch from across the range of reef fish species. This is where the element of unsustainability exists. It is in this area that authorities should be addressing significant change.” Cr Byrne said.

Cr Byrne said ‘the removal of human interaction’ far from being ‘exciting’ was simply a lazy and scientifically sloppy approach to Marine Park management.

“What GBRMPA and the Ministerial Council need to do, is to accept that real and sustainable management practices need to be introduced; but these need to be developed in consultation with the people who have the impact thrust upon them, which are all those hundreds of thousands of people who live in coastal townships from Wide Bay in southern Queensland, to the towns of Far North Queensland.” Cr Byrne said.

“We need to look at practices such as bag limits, seasonal spawning closures and limited take zones. These will do much more in practice, than simply closing 25% of the Reef and thereby placing inordinate pressure on remaining areas.” Cr Byrne said.

Ends
We need a few more local councils like this.
Vern

kc
24-08-2002, 09:07 AM
he gets my vote.

Hope a few papers actually print this release to combat the campaign being waged by GBRMPA stooges now that the comment phase is over.

Regards

kc

jaybee
24-08-2002, 09:27 AM
The continuing subliminal campaign by the GBRMPA to gain public acceptance of the closure of 25% of the Reef to recreational fishers, will be met by a massive campaign and even open revolt, This campaign should be happening now by all rec fishers from the border to the top end before its too late by writting their local members...
We need to look at practices such as bag limits, seasonal spawning closures and limited take zones. These will do much more in practice, than simply closing 25% of the Reef and thereby placing inordinate pressure on remaining areas This has already been proven in some areas so the government do have figures here...the meeting with my local member she even bought this fact up. However, I personally beleive the bag limits should also be put on the commercial operators as well and in some cases close them out of certain areas.
cheers.

motman
27-08-2002, 02:11 AM
The statement that a bag limit should be put on commerical fishers amuses me as it would be like telling commerical builders, plumbers and other allied tradespersons who build houses and other workers who do commerical type work that has an enviomental impact to only build 3 houses a year or only plant cane in 50% of thier land, thereby reducing income etc and then government services. Come on guys if you print it think about it, its not that simple and no I am not aprofiher, just a thinking concerned fisher. ::)

BurdekinBob
27-08-2002, 07:58 AM
Well said Mr Byrne, we will indeed have a recreational fisho revolt if this madness is allowed to proceed past the draft stage.
I have been saying that ALL boat owners and their friends should participate in a similar boat/trailer convoy to what Molly Robson inspired with her proposal to ban fishing in national parks.
The big difference being that it should be at least state-wide, and that the convoys should approach all of the major towns/cities from all directions at the same time, on the same day.
This action will have maximum political effect if it is done just prior to a federal election.
We really need the draft plan to hit the streets just before the next federal election.
Bob
We must remember that politicians can only relate things to numbers of votes to be won or lost!

kc
27-08-2002, 07:01 PM
Re Motman being "amused" that a suggestion is being put forward on a capping of commercial effort is in itself "amusing" and showing a lack of understanding of some of the impacts of the commercial sector on the reef. A few stats he might like to get his head around...there are currently 1200 commercial vessels licensed to fish the reef for trout..of those last year 558 boats used their licenses and took a reported 2098 tonnes of coral trout. At the same time rec fishers are estimated to have taken between 300 to 400 tonnes. The real problem is that GBRMPA, The CRC and variuos boffins have never told us what is the "sustaiable" catch rate. Rec fishers will cop a reduced bag limit if it needs to be but it must come with a capping on the commecial fleet. Moves are currently underway to reduce the commercial live trout fleet to about 330 boats but with no capping of catch rates and this is plain stupid. As prices go up effort increases, more risks are taken fishing green zones, rough weather (ever see perfect storm) and commercial fishers will catch as many as possible, the majority of which is for export. We need the fleet reduced, catch levels capped at sustainable amounts (whatever this is) and then start looking at bag limits as well for rec fishers. We don't want commercial fishers reduced to "3 houses a year" just reduced to levels which will not see coral trout go the same way as gem fish, southern bluefin and orange roughy (and barra in QLD before the closed seasons started). It is just plain dumb having increasingly restrictive bag limits on rec fishers while the commercial fleet continues on its merry way..fair go for the pros, fair go for recs and most of all fair go for the poor f#@%# fish!!