PDA

View Full Version : Reef tourism more help than hindrance



jaybee
05-09-2003, 06:34 PM
By MALCOLM WEATHERUP 04sep03

TOURISM is good, not bad, for the Great Barrier Reef -- and that's official.

A Reef Co-operative Research Centre review of tourism activities on the Reef concludes that tourist operators play a central role in safeguarding it, acting as "reef watchdogs".

Professor Russell Reichelt, the centre's CEO, said the review's findings were contrary to the public impression that tourism damaged the environment.

He sees the review's findings as a win-win situation.

"Marine tourism plays a key role in maintaining the health of the reef," he said in a statement released yesterday.

"At the same time, the industry generates $1.5 billion in annual income, plus extensive overseas investment."

He said tourism operators acted as reef watchdogs and were often the first to spot something that may be going wrong, like coral bleaching.

Their information could get scientists on the spot quickly.

He noted that the industry had introduced codes of practice to reduce damage to the reef, to ensure wildlife was not disturbed and that tourists were not endangered.

"The Great Barrier Reef has about 1.6 million visitors each year, but the 'footprint' of marine tourism is small," he said.

"The reef has more than 2900 individual reefs and 940 islands, so the human pressure is thinly spread."

The reef's manager, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, agrees with the review's assessment.

A spokesman said tourism was an educator, and gave people a sense of ownership of the reef.

He said tourists caused minimal reef damage, and only in a small and controlled area.

Luke
05-09-2003, 06:44 PM
I agree, when we went diving and snorkelling up there last year we were watched very closely and if our fins touched the coral we were back on board-trip over if caught- no second chances. Not sure if all operators act the same way but you'd hope so.

jaybee
06-09-2003, 03:28 AM
hi luke
do they still so trips where they let people walk all over the shallows amongst the coral?
cheers.

kc
06-09-2003, 11:45 AM
& so the GBRMPA propogander continues. As soon as fisho's turn the heat back on GBRMPA about tourism damage and the RAP issue they manage to trot out some report saying tourism is "good" for the reef. No mention that fisho's also see and report reef problems or misuse!! Where would all the birds be which roost overnight on reef pontoons be if no pontoons existed?? No doubt back on the Islands interacting naturally with the ecosytem rather than having all the nitrates (bird crap) which gathers on the pontoons to wash into the water each time it rains. All the fish which hang around reef pontoons for feeding time rather than interacting naturally with the ecosystem. The explosion of species like cockatoos and curajongs on tourist islands like Hamilton as a direct result of human interaction. The tonnes of sewage which pours overboard from tourist boats (which do not have holding tanks).....give me a break!! While I agree the actual area of the park "used" by tourism is pretty small relative to the entire area, the damage caused by tourism, in particular charter fleets and their anchor damage is pretty hard to ignore, as for being "good" for the reef ?? Personally, I making a living both directly and indirectly from reef tourism and am not going to be hypocritical enough to say it should be stopped but to say it is good for the reef (while at the same time shafting rec fisho's as the villains) is a bit
%^$# rich to say the least. We all have an impact, some greater and some lesser than others. It is fisho's who are being shut out of over 100,000 square kilometers of the park by GBRMPA while everyone else just goes on their merry way.....hand in hand with GBRMPA and their greener than green band of little pals.

Kerry
06-09-2003, 12:38 PM
;D now if only the dear beloved [smiley=angel.gif] tourist pontoon operators actually told the real story of how they control the bird issue on the pontoons :-X

Simply let the cats out at night, don't ya just love hyprocrites. And they'd probably have the hide to say Cats? what cats we don't have cats, we are responsible tourist operators protecting the GBR. Yeah right.

Cheers, Kerry.

Gazza
06-09-2003, 12:48 PM
"At the same time, the industry generates $1.5 billion in annual income, plus extensive overseas investment."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
How much of that $1.5B+ dollars go back "into" the "repair" of the reef??

(A free trip to a couple of scientists to "look" at coral bleaching ::) ,ain't counted ;) )

So how many "reefs have been saved" by tourism dollars ?