suzygs1000
15-08-2009, 03:04 PM
Hi,
I recently fitted a Navman F215 fuel monitor to my boat.
I did a trip out to the reef, three weeks ago, and the gauge said that I had use 61 litres for a total trip of 131 k's.
At refill,the tank took 55 litres, which is what I assumed would have been about the usage based on previous trips.
I calibrated the F215 unit to match my actual usage.
I went to Trunk Reef on thursday.
Following info may be of some interest to members:
Boat ...plate alloy centre console
length, bow to transom.....5.8 m
length, bowsprit to swimplatform...6.1 m
estimated total weight (three aboard)...1500 kg's
motor....2007 140 Suzuki
prop...14x21 three blade standard Suzy ally
fuel...standard unleaded
weather.... 800mm chop outbound, calm on return.
Fuel usage.
The best I saw was about 15.6 lph , running at about 4000 rpms on the way home at about 40kph , dead flat sea.
The worst was while off the plane at around 3000 rpm, 20 kmh, 13 lph.
At cruise speed of 4200 rpm, 44 kmh, fuel usage was showing as 16.2 lph.
When the trip meter read 100 k's, on the way home, I hit the total usage button, which read 43.6 litres, => the boat was achieving 43.6 litres per 100 k's.
The total trip was 128 km's, for a total consumption of 53.1 litres.
This agrees pretty well with my historical usage for a trip to Trunk.
I recently fitted a 2000 x 2800 bimini top, and speed at 4000 rpm's increased by about 2 kms per hour, so fuel usage would have improved proportionaly, and I believe I am using about 2 to 3 litres per trip less with the bimini fitted.
From the above, it looks like on a good day, the boat will quite easily achieve 2.5 k's per litre, dropping to about 2.2 on a day with 800mm to a metre of chop.
Also, moving around the reef off the plane really chews the juice up!
I know exactly how much fuel I use at a refill, as I have the transparent reinforced fuel tank filler hose, and I have been filling it up until I see the fuel halfway up the filler hose.
Hope this is of interest to some members.
I know we often have discussions re the relative benefit of a four stroke over a normally aspirated two stroke, given the relative disparity in price of the two types.
My last boat was of similar length, but 200 kilos lighter then my current one.
It was fitted with a 2000 model Johnson 115hp Oceanpro, normally aspirated two stroke.
It used about 80 litres for the same trip.
With current fuel costs, this is about $32 more fuel, plus the two stroke oil.
Considering the relative resale values of the respective types of engines, I feel that the extra outlay for the four stroke is money well spent.
Hope this interests some members.
Dave.8-)
I recently fitted a Navman F215 fuel monitor to my boat.
I did a trip out to the reef, three weeks ago, and the gauge said that I had use 61 litres for a total trip of 131 k's.
At refill,the tank took 55 litres, which is what I assumed would have been about the usage based on previous trips.
I calibrated the F215 unit to match my actual usage.
I went to Trunk Reef on thursday.
Following info may be of some interest to members:
Boat ...plate alloy centre console
length, bow to transom.....5.8 m
length, bowsprit to swimplatform...6.1 m
estimated total weight (three aboard)...1500 kg's
motor....2007 140 Suzuki
prop...14x21 three blade standard Suzy ally
fuel...standard unleaded
weather.... 800mm chop outbound, calm on return.
Fuel usage.
The best I saw was about 15.6 lph , running at about 4000 rpms on the way home at about 40kph , dead flat sea.
The worst was while off the plane at around 3000 rpm, 20 kmh, 13 lph.
At cruise speed of 4200 rpm, 44 kmh, fuel usage was showing as 16.2 lph.
When the trip meter read 100 k's, on the way home, I hit the total usage button, which read 43.6 litres, => the boat was achieving 43.6 litres per 100 k's.
The total trip was 128 km's, for a total consumption of 53.1 litres.
This agrees pretty well with my historical usage for a trip to Trunk.
I recently fitted a 2000 x 2800 bimini top, and speed at 4000 rpm's increased by about 2 kms per hour, so fuel usage would have improved proportionaly, and I believe I am using about 2 to 3 litres per trip less with the bimini fitted.
From the above, it looks like on a good day, the boat will quite easily achieve 2.5 k's per litre, dropping to about 2.2 on a day with 800mm to a metre of chop.
Also, moving around the reef off the plane really chews the juice up!
I know exactly how much fuel I use at a refill, as I have the transparent reinforced fuel tank filler hose, and I have been filling it up until I see the fuel halfway up the filler hose.
Hope this is of interest to some members.
I know we often have discussions re the relative benefit of a four stroke over a normally aspirated two stroke, given the relative disparity in price of the two types.
My last boat was of similar length, but 200 kilos lighter then my current one.
It was fitted with a 2000 model Johnson 115hp Oceanpro, normally aspirated two stroke.
It used about 80 litres for the same trip.
With current fuel costs, this is about $32 more fuel, plus the two stroke oil.
Considering the relative resale values of the respective types of engines, I feel that the extra outlay for the four stroke is money well spent.
Hope this interests some members.
Dave.8-)